<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>seo myths &#8211; Toronto Digital Marketing Company</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.createdigitalgrowth.com/tag/seo-myths/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.createdigitalgrowth.com</link>
	<description>Would You Like More, Higher Quality Web Traffic? Serving the GTA including Richmond Hill and Markham.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 21:09:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.2.19</generator>
	<item>
		<title>SEO Misinformation Creates Many Myths</title>
		<link>https://www.createdigitalgrowth.com/seo-misinformation-creates-many-myths/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 21:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay G.]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Optimizing for Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optimizing for MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optimizing for Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Penalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO Scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webmaster News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo myths]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.createdigitalgrowth.com/?p=48</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[The amount of misinformation floating around the web as it relates to search engine optimization is staggering.  It seems that 9 out of every 10 posts I read contains blatantly wrong advice.  I am begininning to think that some very sneaky SEO pro&#8217;s are spreading incorrect info on purpose. Here is a thread I came <a href="https://www.createdigitalgrowth.com/seo-misinformation-creates-many-myths/" rel="nofollow"><span class="sr-only">Read more about SEO Misinformation Creates Many Myths</span>[&#8230;]</a>]]></description>
								<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The amount of misinformation floating around the web as it relates to search engine optimization is staggering.  It seems that 9 out of every 10 posts I read contains blatantly wrong advice.  I am begininning to think that some very sneaky SEO pro&#8217;s are spreading incorrect info on purpose.</p>
<p>Here is a thread I came across today over at DevShed Forums &#8211; the poster is asking the following question:</p>
<p><em><span id="intelliTxt">Hi all,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m based in Australia, and looking around for a VPS host. It&#8217;s down to 2 options, local or US hosting. I&#8217;m told that if my host is in Australia, that will help my Australian search ranking, but that if my host is in the US, it will help my US ranking. Is this really true? Why would it be so? Is it some kind of algorithm that assumes added relevance if the host is local?</span></em></p>
<p>Some of the responses (as quoted below) were quite interesting and only added to the confusion.</p>
<p><em><span id="intelliTxt">&#8220;yes it is true, but it is not necessary that you need to host in particular country.&#8221;</span></em></p>
<p><em><span id="intelliTxt">&#8220;Server location affects the ranking in Search Engine Result Pages (SERP) but not always&#8221;</span></em></p>
<p><em><span id="intelliTxt">&#8220;It depends on what and where you are targeting rather than the server location&#8221;</span></em></p>
<p><em><span id="intelliTxt">&#8220;this is one of the factor among 1000 which affect your ranking&#8221;</span></em></p>
<p><em><span id="intelliTxt">&#8220;Constant work on the website will improve the website ranking on Google dot com too&#8221;</span></em></p>
<p>It seems like the object of the above replies was to keep the original poster as confused as possible!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
										</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
